<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/98797</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>PinkBerry vs Red Mango and Why This Won&#039;t End Well</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/anand-sanwal/investile-dysfunction-blog/pinkberry-vs-red-mango-and-why-wont-end-well</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/anand-sanwal/investile-dysfunction-blog/pinkberry-vs-red-mango-and-why-wont-end-well&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/cic-partners">CIC Partners</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/maveron">Maveron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/pinkberry">Pinkberry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/red-mango">Red Mango</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/yogurt">yogurt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/management-1">Management</category>
 <node>974333</node>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:22:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anand Sanwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">974333 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google Doesn&#039;t Have an Organic Growth Problem</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/anand-sanwal/investile-dysfunction-blog/google-doesnt-have-organic-growth-problem</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/anand-sanwal/investile-dysfunction-blog/google-doesnt-have-organic-growth-problem&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/corporate-portfolio-management">corporate portfolio management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/google">google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/it-portfolio-management">IT portfolio management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/organic-growth">organic growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/project-portfolio-management">project portfolio management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/reengineering">reengineering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/techcrunch">TechCrunch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/yahoo-0">Yahoo!</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/management-1">Management</category>
 <node>974329</node>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:09:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anand Sanwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">974329 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/857956</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry.  Last comment submitted a bit early.  Overall, the list is very US-centric and there doesn&#039;t seem to be any priority given to the size of the market the innovation is attacking which it should.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is my $.02.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.  &lt;a href=&quot;www.zopa.com&quot;&gt;Zopa&lt;/a&gt; should replace &lt;a href=&quot;www.prosper.com&quot;&gt;Prosper&lt;/a&gt;.  Both are doing great things in P2P lending which will be big but Zopa&#039;s approach is more sophisticated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/857956&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <node>857956</node>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:14:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anand Sanwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">857956 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/857943</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My thoughts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zopa.com&quot;&gt;Zopa.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>857943</node>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:01:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anand Sanwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">857943 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>P2P Lending: Big, Established Financial Services Companies Should Worry About This Innovation</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/anand-sanwal/investile-dysfunction-blog/p2p-lending-big-established-financial-services-companie</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I would love to get people&#039;s thoughts/views on the prospects for P2P lending and why they feel it doesn&#039;t get as much publicity/press as other innovations these days a la social networking, crowdsourcing, anything green, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;links&quot;&gt;&lt;li  class=&quot;first last og_links&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/group/innovation&quot; class=&quot;og_links&quot;&gt;Innovation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/anand-sanwal/investile-dysfunction-blog/p2p-lending-big-established-financial-services-companie&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/creativity">creativity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/financial-services">financial services</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/ideas">ideas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/p2p-lending">p2p lending</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/prosper">prosper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/zopa">zopa</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <node>857916</node>
 <group domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/group/innovation">Innovation</group>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:28:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anand Sanwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">857916 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/802134</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Elizabeth - This is one of the best columns I&#039;ve read in a long long time.  Business and the management of business is not a science so despite the well-crafted storytelling of the pundits, most business books are just good stories built on dubious assertions and data.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And so it was good to see someone point this out so publicly.  Your final paragraphs were so spot on I could only smile after reading them.  It&#039;s about time others point out the dumb&#039;ification of business as promoted in business books.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/802134&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <node>802134</node>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:04:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anand Sanwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">802134 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This article is pretty interesting and Jeong Kim who heads up the group is undoubtedly a great innovator.  Some of Kim&#039;s interesting insights &amp;amp; actions as the head of Bell Labs include his use of a venture capital type approach to innovation as &quot;Kim has grouped the Labs&#039; more audacious research efforts under what&#039;s now called Alcatel-Lucent Ventures, or ALV.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This skunk-works for innovation makes a lot of sense.  And several interesting ideas are emerging from these efforts which the article details.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-217&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <node>704542</node>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anand Sanwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">704542 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
