RSS Feed The Lab

5:47 pm | 0 recommendations | 4 comments

Technology: Ashlee Simpson And The Future Of Teleconferencing

| posted by Chris Dannen

I know, I know -- what part of the upward march of humanity doesn't depend on Ashlee Simpson? Well here's a bit of tech that owes her a particular nod. It's made by a new company called Vapps, and it's the first high-speed teleconferencing technology to hit the wires since Skype revolutionized the way human beings communicate long-distance.

Picture%202.png
(Photographer: Michael Caulfield/WireImage.com)

Ashley spent Wednesday, also the final day of Hanukkah, reading The Polar Express to a group of 100 hospitalized children, most of whom weren't even in the same state. The feat was a demonstration of Vapps' HighSpeed Conferencing, a broadband-based teleconferencing solution that uses Skype to deliver ultra high-quality voice conferencing to up to 500 participants. It does this, I should note, at a flat rate per month, eschewing the per-minute pricing structure of the telecom companies and saving companies bags of money in the process. Using the traditional Skype program, users are limited to group chats of 4 to 9 participants, so this is a big step up for big businesses.

Listening to Ashlee (or anyone, for that matter) over a HighSpeed teleconference connection, you begin to ask yourself one question. It's not: how did they do this? It's not: what does it mean to want to La-La**? The question is: how on earth are we still dealing with the awful sound quality of telephones, well into the age of ubiquitous internet, hybrid cars and Coke Zero?

**For the uninitiated:

Before we go on, I should make an admission. I hate conference calls. Hate them. They're boring, even if everyone in your office is terrific and interesting (which, ahem, everyone at FastCompany is.)

Even if you hate conference calls, they're a necessity. But when you talk to people on one of Vapps' teleconferences (as when you talk on Skype between two computer users), the interaction actually feels productive, because you can completely understand what people are saying. Obviously, nowhere is this more important than business conference calls, which are already notoriously difficult to make productive and efficient.

Because HighSpeed Conferencing is computer-based, you can use their software to see who is in your conference, and invite them in with your PC. (Participants can also dial into a HighSpeed conference with a regular phone and not disturb everyone else's high-def audio -- although you'll sound, to them, just as mediocre as a traditional phone call.)

The electronic invitations and visual management of the conference is almost as important as the quality of the call itself, especially as the logistics of group calls can be almost as tough as the issues they're meant to hash out. If your company doesn't do big calls, here's a dramatization of their traditional course:

Moderator: Has everyone called in? Los Angeles, are you there?

Los Angeles: [Crackle] Yeah, we're here, Jim.

Moderator: Dallas, are you here?

Dallas: Howdy [Crackle] we're here.

Moderator: Tulsa, are you here? ....

Moderator: Tulsa?

Moderator: Ah, sh*t.

When you can see who's in your conference, and actually hear more of the range and timbre of the voices on the other end of the line, you can actually have a collaborative discussion where people jump in, make comments and pose questions (because you can understand them, and tell, by voice, who's speaking). This is a great thing.

Don't get me wrong; few people will go to sleep at night thanking God for Vapps. But it's one of those crucial and long-awaited uses of technology for pragmatic, if unglamorous, purposes that could make life in the office just a little easier.

Comment

Recent Comments | 4 Total

December 14, 2007 at 9:40am

Snorkey

It would be nice if Vaaps were used for cc's (conference calls)for the investor class. Now we can physically see a CEO's expression and body language when they give their quarterly reports online. We wouldn't have to wade thru the PR that a company might throw at us. A great edge in investing, I think.
As far as Ashlee goes, is she washed up? After her debacle at the Orange Bowl a couple of years ago, (she was booed) I thought we had seen the last of her. Just makes you want to "SSSSCRRRREAMMM!!!"

December 17, 2007 at 12:24pm

Paul Svec

Rather "vapid" revue of a technology that's been around for a decade. Quality of the call is dependent on a whole bunch of things: like one of the participants being on a cell phone which will destroy the con call for everyone. Skype and all other VoIP calls depend entirely on the quality of the broadband link. If you're on home DSL while Jimmy is gaming online next door, you're conference experience will suck.

The price point is ok, but no big deal on quality. There are many much higher quality services available.

December 18, 2007 at 7:36am

T1 Baltimore

I'll have to agree with Paul Svec. Apparently this writer has not experienced the service level that a decent conferencing provider can offer. There are too many cut rate / low level conferencing service providers out there. I have not used Vapps, so I can't comment on their service, but I have used the services of MANY conferencing providers. While Paul's review points out the fact that the experience may depend on certain factors such as how people are connecting, the fact is - certain providers are just plain better at what they do!

December 20, 2007 at 12:03pm

Rebecca

Hahahaha I just want to say how entertaining this post was (okay, AND informative). Well done! Also, it should be interesting to see if Vapps revolutionizes teleconferencing or if it's will merely remain "just another option."

Comment

Advertiser Links