RSS Feed im-media-te impact

7:05 am | 2 recommendations | 1 comment

A little rant about politics...

| posted by Brian Reich
I just have to rant a little about politics.

It does not take a rocket scientist to understand that if what you are doing isn't working anymore, you need to make a change.  

That's true in business -- if your product isn't selling, you need consider a different way of marketing it.  That's true in sports -- if your team isn't winning, you need to consider hiring new personnel or adjusting your style of play.  That is true in media -- if nobody is reading the print edition of your newspaper anymore, you need to consider putting more content online.  That is true in life -- and there are countless examples you could apply.

Why doesn't that concept apply to politics?

For years, candidates have been running campaigns that don't reflect the will of the voters.  The voters ask for a discussion of the issues, the candidates respond with soundbites and rhetoric.  The voters want to understand the candidates' records, and the campaigns respond by distoring their opponent's positions and smearing their character.  The campaigns keep doing the same thing, over and over.  How do the voters respond?  They tune out -- only a fraction of eligible voters show up at the polls, while nearly everyone who is asked expresses frustration, if not distaste, for the state of politics.

This cycle was supposed to be different.  Barack Obama and John McCain both ran against politics-as-usual.  They vowed to wage a campaign that focused on issues and avoided negative attacks.  They even flirted with the idea of holding town hall meetings, barnstorming the country and listening to voters concerns together.  

Then the gloves came off.

Last night, in the second of three Presidential debates, John McCain and Barack Obama went on the attack.  I don't think either candidate gave an answer (and I use the term 'answer' loosely because very few of the statements the candidates made actually responded to the questions that there posed) that didn't include a reference to the other guy.  They barely made eye contact the whole night.  And in TV and web ads, stump speeches and interviews that follow the debate, and consume our attention for the next 29 days, we'll see more of the same.

That's not what voters want.  There are important matters facing our country -- the economy, the war, healthcare, and education to name a few -- that deserve real debate.  We want to pick a President who we feel confident understands, and has a plan for addressing these critical issues.  But how are we to decide which candidate is best when neither one seems interested (or capable) of putting forward their own views, choosing instead to undermine the credibility and character of their opponent.  

Politics is broken.  What the candidates and campaigns are doing simply isn't working any more.  Something needs to change.  Its not likely to happen this cycle, and there is little prospect that politics will improve in the near future.  But that doesn't mean we don't deserve, and shouldn't demand better.
Sign in or register to comment.

Recent Comments | 1 Total

October 8, 2008 at 8:40pm

Vernon Martin
Wow Brian, thanks for a very thought provoking piece. A double minded affair unravels before us. Media, as the sideline referee, helps to set the rules that politicians must consider when running their campaign. Either you follow suit or find yourself portrayed as another naive candidate. If you decide to run an open honest campaign without stooping to the low tactics of attacking the opponent, you may be characterized is too timid. Why do we choose to act as though we are blind to the rules? I like, however, the claims that start with phrases like, “what voters want to hear…” Voters are varied and diverse and some of them couldn’t tell you what they want to hear. Why don’t candidates state specific answers about broad and complex issues, maybe its attempt to avoid the alienation of constituents needed to win the election? Unfortunately, the parallel to that is avoiding answers because you know that your real answer will show that you are disconnected with the American public. Finally, current debates are basically staged engagements. Candidates have studied past debates so thoroughly that each candidate has a basic script and the job is to turn any and every question into a lead in to a pre-planned answer whether it matched the question or not. That’s why interviews where candidates are asked questions that include follow up questions are a better test of readiness and judgment. One thing that needs to change is our support of those that introduce change. We need to support them in spite of media’s presentation. What voters want (just kidding), what we need is an overhaul, but change will not come in as a wave, it will seep in like a leak that formed crevices in parts of the Grand Canyon. Vernon http://vernonmartincoaching.com/Home.aspx

Special Editions?

Advertiser Links